|
|
Posted by Pedro on 07/06/05 00:56
Good Luck Johem:
Please post your new class when U have it sussed.
In the meantime me gonna continute using Smarty cos it works for me
ie sperating application code from presentation code.
Thanks smarty dev's
me luv it ;-)
pedro
Jochem Maas wrote:
> boots wrote:
>
>> Just to add another fan to this fire, I never thought much of Smarty
>> automatically providing autoglobals to the template. It really is a
>> break from its tradition of providing a clean environment where the
>> caller specifies the characteristics of the environment. Not that one
>> should see that as a stabbing knife to use on the devs -- it was a bad
>> design choice that obviously seemed like a good idea at the time. I
>> suspect it was added during a younger, more "innocent" period of the
>> internet. Unfortunately, it is now caked in.
>
>
> to be clear: I wholly accept that.
>
>>
>> If you are really paranoid, you can probabably clobber untrusted
>> autoglobals in the PHP namespace before running your template but that
>> is a poor work-around. I would certainly vote to have this "feature"
>> become optional.
>>
>> That said, what's with the animosity towards the devs and their
>> very-correct goal of trying to keep Smarty clean and simple? Does a
>> contradiction invalidate all of their efforts? Finally, why is this
>> discussion on smarty-general? It is one thing to hijack a thread, it is
>
>
> sorry for hijacking - put that down to laziness - I have now sent a
> subscription
> request to smarty-internals - I'll monitor that as well and try my best
> to keep
> any relevant comments,questions,ideas,queries,etc to correct list & thread
> in future!
>
> actually my concerns go out mostly to php5, the BC argument is strong and
> therefore I'm really theorizing/thinking about goals/functionality in terms
> of how/what is implemented at a stage when BC will have to be broken in
> some
> way - this assumes that:
>
> 1. the Smarty code itself will eventually be refactored
> into php5 (a very good candidate given the heavily documented and very well
> structured code - e.g. some of the methods are 'dying' to be made
> 'private')
> 2. the template syntax will eventually support php5 syntax (e.g. static
> class
> syntax, dereferenced syntax)
>
>> another to hijack it and change the topic to something no longer
>> appropriate for the channel. BTW--those are rhetorical, I don't expect
>> or require responses, thanks :)
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________ Yahoo! Sports
>> Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
>> http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
>>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|