|
|
Posted by -Lost on 05/12/07 15:25
shimmyshack wrote:
> On May 12, 3:03 pm, -Lost <maventheextrawo...@techie.com> wrote:
>> shimmyshack wrote:
>>> On May 12, 12:42 pm, -Lost <maventheextrawo...@techie.com> wrote:
>>>> -Lost wrote:
>>>>> shimmyshack wrote:
>>>>>> should return the correct content-type for javascript.
>>>>>> header( 'Content-Type: text/x-javascript' );
>>>>> Just wondering, where did you get that MIME from?
>>>>> I thought it was supposed to be:
>>>>> application/x-javascript
>>>>> At least "application/javascript" is not obsolete yet.
>>>>> Then again, I cannot read an RFC to save my life.
>>>> Bah, disregard shimmyshack. I didn't even see any posts beyond yours
>>>> until I posted the above.
>>> dont worry, its my fault for being so slap dash with the keyboard.
>>> I actually just copy the apache default, it seems to be very
>>> prevelant, although google get it right as per RFC, so perhaps I could
>>> start to change my coding habits, or at least my mimes.type file!!
>> Do you keep a MIME list or do you poll an RFC server?
>>
>> I prefer to keep my own MIME, as required/normally used MIME types don't
>> change too much in my applications.
>>
>> The mime.types files I have from Apache 1.3 and 2.x are identical. How
>> old of an install are you using if it has an obsolete JavaScript MIME type?
>>
>> Mine is from 2004/07/15 12:34pm (1089909240).
>>
>> --
>> -Lost
>> Remove the extra words to reply by e-mail. Don't e-mail me. I am
>> kidding. No I am not.
>
> I keep my own where it isn't in the apache mime.types file,
> even the latest version of apache 2.2.4 gives
> application/x-javascript js
> which is a bit of a cheek because earlier in the file it has a
> reference to
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/
> which gives it as
> application/javascript
> (and has a bit of a whinge: "Various unregistered media types have
> been used in an ad-hoc fashion")
> so for years I have kept the apache default, trying every now and then
> to update, perhaps it is time as Michael says.
Yeah, I just noticed that as well in the mime.types and the RFC.
Definitely time to pay attention to the updated MIME types and not the
old! ;)
--
-Lost
Remove the extra words to reply by e-mail. Don't e-mail me. I am
kidding. No I am not.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|