|
|
Posted by Jeff North on 05/26/07 14:48
On Sat, 26 May 2007 08:43:03 +0100, in comp.lang.php Toby A Inkster
<usenet200703@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<715li4-pom.ln1@ophelia.g5n.co.uk> wrote:
>| Jeff North wrote:
>| > Toby A Inkster wrote:
>| >
>| >> This might be OK in Australia, where postal codes cover
>| >> fairly large populations,
>| >
>| > Where did you get this silly idea from? Our major cities do have
>| > sub-divisions called suburbs. Maybe you've heard of them.
>|
>| And suburbs (at least in Sydney, where I lived for over half my life)
>| roughly match up with postcodes. For example, the 2034 code covers Coogee,
>| 2035 Maroubra and so on.
2034 COOGEE
2034 SOUTH COOGEE
2035 MAROUBRA
2035 MAROUBRA SOUTH
2035 PAGEWOOD
>| However, suburb boundaries are fuzzy, whereas
>| postcode boundaries are well-defined; whatsmore while different people
>| might give different names to the same place, the four-digit postcode is
>| unarguable.
>|
>| So in Australia, postcodes might work well as a standardised sub-state
>| geographic division. In other countries, it's less useful.
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorthau@yourpantsyahoo.com.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|