|
|
Posted by dorayme on 05/28/07 07:14
In article <f3duen$lq0$03$1@news.t-online.com>,
Knut Krueger <knut.krueger@usa.com> wrote:
> dorayme schrieb:
> > In article <f3cfia$2ob$00$1@news.t-online.com>,
> > Knut Krueger <knut.krueger@usa.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Jukka K. Korpela schrieb:
> >>
> >> > Ceterum censeo: most authors gain nothing but confusion by using XHTML
> >> > instead of good old HTML 4.01.
> >> >
> >> Anything what's not working with 4.01?
> >
> > A lot more things will not work, on average, for now if you don't
> > use 4.01
> >
> but isn`t the wc3 validation better in XHTML
> means <p><b> test </p></b>
> is marked as wrong in XHTML but not in HTML4.01?
>
"<p><b> test </p></b>" is wrong under any standard including
4.01. What are you thinking?
> And what charset is the best voe 4.01 strict?
>
This is quite an independent question to which doctype to use.
What is best depends on what you want to do. Read carefully
everything J. Korpela has to say on this question as he knows
things. Discussion on this comes up all the time on this ng.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|