| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Darko on 05/28/07 16:24 
On May 28, 6:09 pm, "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaugh...@Hotmail.com> wrote: 
> "Michael" <MichaelDMcDonn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> 
> news:1180368213.786423.310320@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com... 
> 
> > Since the include function is called from within a PHP script, why 
> > does the included file have to identify itself as a PHP again by 
> > enclosing its code in <?php> ... <?> 
> 
> > One would assume that the PHP interpreter works like any other, that 
> > is, it first expands all the include files, and then parses the 
> > resulting text. Can anyone help with an explanation? 
It's not supposed to be bracketed by <?php> and <?>, but by <?php 
and ? 
>. That's not necessary, though. You have to put those symbols into 
 
your require-d file if you want it to be understood like php code, but 
if you don't, it will be understood as raw output. Just like any other 
php file: 
<?php 
    if ( $x ) { 
?> 
some output here 
some output here 
some output here 
<?php 
    } else { 
?> 
some other output here 
some other output here 
some other output here 
<?php 
    } 
?> 
 
As for the require-d file, the same counts - if you didn't put <?php 
and ?> surrounding the contents of the file, they would be understood 
as ordinary output, not php code (which, of course, can be exactly 
what we wanted). 
 
> 
> Because a php can contain other text such as html... the parser is only 
> signaled to work on the block that is inside a the php tag... 
> 
> you ever wonder why <? php ?> looks like an html tag?  cause it is! 
I wouldn't go that far to say <?php and ?> are html tags, although 
they do resemble them having lt and gt chars. Actually, the <? and ?> 
are part of xml processing instruction declaration syntax, so when we 
say "<?php" we say "give the following contents to php", and when we 
say "?>", we actually say "those contents end here". So, php code is 
actually organized as xml document, and html out of <?php ?> 
instructions perfectly fits in that concept, being itself a subset of 
xml, although older than xml.
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |