|
|
Posted by dorayme on 06/06/07 04:56
In article <Xns9946D9699FED1arbpenyahoocom@69.28.186.121>,
Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "asdf" <asdf@asdf.com> writing in
> news:46662a61$0$22460$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:
>
> > Me too, but the reality is that most web browsing is still done with
> > IE. No choice... you *have* to at least make pages usable/readable in
> > IE, sadly, unless you have the luxury of a non-commercial project
> > where the client doesn't care if it works for most people or not.
> >
>
> I am beginning to see liqht at the end of the tunnel, there is hope. Mind
> you, it's a small web site <http://www.realtybenefitsystems.com/>, whose
> users are coming from Craig's list looking at apartments for rent - but the
> stats for May were 65% IE, 15% Firefox, 15% Safari, and 5% other. These
> are real numbers (not something out of a "web stats" script) from page
> views, not hits.
15% Safari? I am starting to feel less like I am in an exclusive
club now. I do not know if this is good or bad. Who knows how to
deal with such existential questions? Not me.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|