Posted by Andy Dingley on 06/14/07 09:05

On 13 Jun, 21:09, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:

> Why are so many *new* sites coded in HTML 3.2?

I thought more of them were still HTML 2 than HTML 3.2 ?

HTML 3.2 requires effort. You have to use obsolete content _and_ you
need to attach a 3.2 doctype declaration.

• Next in forum: Re: Safari on XP
• Prev in forum: Re: Safari on XP
• Thread view: Re: moving from HTML to XHTML

[Reply to this message]