|
|
Posted by Leonard Blaisdell on 07/10/05 01:59
In article <MPG.1d396d82b8e2cf9c9896c4@news.intergate.com>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@neredbojias.com> wrote:
> I was merely stating that a lone singularity is nothing if it has no
> effect on anything. However, the supposed singularity that spawned the
> Big Bang *did* have an effect: to wit, us and our universe and all that
> is or ever was. (Ahem, "is" and "was" are time-dependent notions.)
> So... out of nothing comes something, or so say the science boys. But
> if that is true, it couldn't have been nothing after all unless you
> redefine nothing.
alt.philosophy is over there ------> ;-)
<h1>I am a singularity</h1> Other than assorted mites,
beneficial/detrimental bacteria, etc. Nothing is me but me. What
composes me is common.
I was blown off by the professor in a physics class when I was a
sophomore or so when I tried to apply entropy to life. Let's talk about
that. His answer was unsatisfying.
All in fun and with a smile.
leo
--
<http://web0.greatbasin.net/~leo/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|