Posted by Michael Vilain on 06/23/07 01:08

In article <tim.streater-29501E.09503522062007@news.individual.net>,
Tim Streater <tim.streater@dante.org.uk> wrote:

> In article <slrnf7mjki.6lu.bit-bucket@shell.config.com>,
> Allodoxaphobia <bit-bucket@config.com> wrote:
>
> > ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.php.]
> > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:53:17 GMT, jdoerr wrote:
> > > Hey, that's the question. I know Perl, so should I learn PHP?
> >
> > Participating in comp.lang.php is a lot more pleasant
> > than participating in comp.lang.perl.
>
> That's been my experience too. perl types are much too geeky for normal
> people - you only have to read the perl book to see that.

Why, thank you. You say the sweetest things...

http://www.geocities.com/mev94303y/dilbert-unix.gif
http://www.geocities.com/mev94303y/sfr/surprised.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/mev94303y/sfr/troublewithhell.jpg

--
DeeDee, don't press that button! DeeDee! NO! Dee...

• Next in forum: MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (561)
• Prev in forum: People who reply to spammers [was: Re: I need some cleanings tips and advice.]
• Thread view: Re: Why PHP instead of Perl?

[Reply to this message]