|
|
Posted by dorayme on 06/23/07 12:16
In article <slrnf7pjm7.dbt.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote:
> On 2007-06-22, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > In article <f5gh8p$ja0$1@news.onet.pl>,
> > "K." <halinacierniak@poczta.onet.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> > <a href="http://www.example.com"
> >> > style="display:block;padding:40px;">Link
> >> > to page</a>
> >>
> >> Thank you. It works but padding variable is not need
> >>
> >
> > If you don't have padding, what quite is the difference between
> > no style at all in the link and mere display: block for your
> > purpose? You delivering the padding from elsewhere?
>
> Padding will still make the clickable area wider-- the full width of the
> space available in the <td>-- but generally not much taller.
I was a little puzzled to know what OP would benefit from 2 over
1 in
<http://members.optushome.com.au/droovies/test/display.html>
The differences are all a bit strange across different browsers
and text sizes.
(just btw, I discovered that iCab breaks the line after // in the
left cell and wraps the www bit! unless one gives a big explicit
width to the table.)
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|