|
|
Posted by David T. Ashley on 06/24/07 17:27
"Sig" <ivanlid@example.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.20e8457c18537bc9989682@islay...
>
> However, ignoring the issue of local clock correction, brought up
> elsewhere in
> this thread, my comment on monotonicity stands. The seconds count will
> repeat,
> rather than go backwards.
Fair enough. However, for my application (where I use the microtime as
well), time repeats rather than being monotonic. For my application, it
would be possible that I get a duplicate (seconds, microtime) pair.
(seconds) is monotonic (I agree with you).
(seconds.microtime) is not monotonic.
--
David T. Ashley (dta@e3ft.com)
http://www.e3ft.com (Consulting Home Page)
http://www.dtashley.com (Personal Home Page)
http://gpl.e3ft.com (GPL Publications and Projects)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|