|
|
Posted by dorayme on 06/30/07 11:10
In article
<Xns995F17CDF4D72nanopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:09:06 GMT dorayme scribed:
>
> > In article
> > <Xns995DE094E8F2Ananopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
> > Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > Now, if something has no lifespan, it cannot be in time.
> >>
> >> Everything you know, imagine, or feel exists within time.
> >
> > I was not talking about what you or anyone knows or imagines or
> > feels. There are plenty of things that are true that no one
> > knows. It just does not make any obvious sense to say about some
> > things (I gave an example) that they exist in time.
> >
> > Anyway, you know what about time? So why would you be insisting
> > that everything exists in it. (Is someone paying you Boji to say
> > this?). You might as well say everything exists in bright
> > daylight but not otherwise.
>
> According to (most) scientists, time did not exist until after the start
> of the Big Bang. Ergo, the Banger itself had to exist outside of time
> prior to that.
This is mistake of yours does not even have a Latin name. I will
have to adapt a phrase of my papa: it is a confusion of the first
waters.
If time begins at the start of the BB, there is prior about it.
Please stop thinking about these things, they can cause brain
damage in the wrong heads.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|