|
|
Posted by SpaceGirl on 07/02/07 13:59
On Jul 1, 1:23 am, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article
> <1183236700.730315.163...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>
> cwdjrxyz <spamtr...@cwdjr.info> wrote:
> > Many monitors for PCs now are set for well over
> > 1000 px wide, and some even add a second monitor to extend the width
> > range. On the other extreme,
>
> What others have said. You have to be very careful not to assume
> too much about what arrangements users will have. As cwdjrxyz
> reminds here, some people can have very wide screens. On Macs for
> quite some time, one can organise monitors as one big screen (by
> not ticking the mirror option). One can have monitors on top of
> each each other too (Try it in Mac preferences, you folk with
> Macs and more than one monitor). My personal preference is the
> second of the two screenshots at:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/35z3kp
>
> --
> dorayme
Yep. My Mac is arranged like this:
19" LCD (1280 x 1024) landscape (video preview)
30" ACD (2560 x 1600) landscape (workspace)
19" LCD (1024 x 1280) portrait (web pages, reference art etc)
My desktop is stretched across all 3 desktops, so as far as a web page
is concerned desktop size is irrelevant.
However... I build all my sites in Flash, and aim for full clarity at
800x600, but they expand to fill whatever space the browser makes
available.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|