|
|
Posted by dorayme on 07/10/07 02:29
In article
<Xns9968C043FC39Ananopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:29:13
> GMT dorayme scribed:
>
> >> >> So all that means exactly what with regard to my number?
> >> >
> >> > It's too big. I can do better than 2000.
> >>
> >> I have no doubt you are correct, but how? I worked on this until I
> >> got migraine of the medulla and now I need some constructive
> >> assistance.
> >
> > Ben, I am begging you not to! You have already given him the clue
> > that it is a lower figure (something I was not prepared to do).
> > It is a clue because if you (who understands arcane things in the
> > css bible) can get a lower figure, it is likely to be lower
> > rather than higher.
>
> I *said* mine probably wasn't optimal. Get the wool outta your ears.
Boji, you have many illusions. So what if you said this? How does
it impact in the slightest way on what I said? So you said not
optimal. So what? Before Ben said what he said (and I do not
blame him at all considering I have hypnotic powers to counter
any ill effects on you) and before I hypnotised you, you poor
schmuck, you did not know if the real answer lay in the direction
of lower. It is irrelevant that you did not beforehand know the
direction.
I will ask you again, I want a sample of your brain for a few
tests that I have been perfecting in my office lab. Just a scoop
from near the lobes.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|