|
Posted by John Hosking on 07/10/07 17:30
William Gill wrote:
>
> David Dorward wrote:
>> XHTML 1.1 adds support for Ruby annotation (which has virtually nil
>> support among clients) and (if used correctly) isn't supported by,
>> among others, Lynx, GoogleBot or any version of Microsoft Internet
>> Explorer. There's plenty of discussion on the subject in the archives
>> of this newsgroup and of comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html.
>
> I did a quick review (I'll get more in depth later, but thought it
> polite to reply promptly), and can see that my efforts would better
> spent getting all my documents from HTML 4 transitional to strict.
What a refreshing change! A poster who lurks first, writes clearly, and
responds politely! I was about to give up hope...
A well-behaved gentleman like yourself would be welcome in most any
technical discussion you'd care to contribute to. You might also want to
visit/lurk/participate at c.i.w.a.html, if you're not already.
One of the multitude of articles and discussions regarding XHTML is
sitting in my bookmarks (from 2005):
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200501/the_perils_of_using_xhtml_properly/
(which URL which probably wrap). That article comes from a different
direction, but touches on some of the issues to consider. Be sure to
read through the comments.
I haven't had need to touch XHTML so I stay with HTML 4.01 strict.
--
John
Pondering the value of the UIP: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|