|
|
Posted by M Bourgon on 07/11/07 14:38
On Jul 10, 4:48 pm, Erland Sommarskog <esq...@sommarskog.se> wrote:
> Personally, I would prefer the definition of the table to be under version
> control and be content with that.
We're working on implementing several changes, that's one of them.
> But why use BCP as a backup tool? Why not simply BACKUP? Or are you
> trying to tell us that this is the only table in a big database that
> you want to back up?
Nope. :) We're working on moving to Partitioned Tables, but right
now we have home-grown partitioning, and we need to deal with old
"partitions".
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|