|
|
Posted by Ed Mullen on 07/16/07 03:36
Neredbojias wrote:
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:02:38
> GMT Ed Mullen scribed:
>
>> boxinghistory99@gmail.com wrote:
>>> <html>
>>>
>>> <h1>Daily Dump</h1>
>>> </center>
>>> <p>
>>> Welcome to <b>The Daily Dump</b>
>>> Yup that is right, <b>The Daily Dump, a forum dedicated to
>>> the discussion of bowel movements</b>, the process every single
>>> human
>>> being
>>> on the planet, even the most pristine princese in the world, must go
>>> through.
>>> And it is that process that The Daily Dump is here to discuss.
>>> So, please remove yourself from the pressures of the real world,
>>> and discuss your dump.<p>
>>>
>>> However, as this is a
>>> <b>forum related to bowel movements and bowel movement stories
>>> only</
>>> b>,
>>>
>>> </html>
>>>
>> I must admit to being at a loss as to what you might possibly want us
>> to evaluate. My thoughts:
>>
>> - The notion of a site dedicated to bowel movements? I mean, well,
>> ok, if I'm really interested in the topic, then, yep, it "works."
>> - The content of the page? Well, gee. What the hell is a
>> "princese?" - And, um, well, the content ends with an incomplete
>> sentence (not to mention the comma) and thought. What am I to make of
>> that? Does it indicate a hanging-chad sort of bowel movement
>> reference? I am nonplussed! - The composition of the HTML? Uh, well,
>> ok, sure, it should display across many different browsers the same
>> way.
>>
>> So, with "does this work?" as a message subject I can only answer:
>> Yes and no. So, how's it working for you? Me? I'm as regular as
>> rain. Which is one reason my doctor, at my last week's annual
>> physical, proclaimed me to be "medically boring." Well, aside from
>> that nasty Dupuytren's contracture in my left palm. Which, since the
>> hand is curling inward does not affect my ability to play the guitar
>> so, well, I'm kinda ok with it. As long as I don't hyper-extend my
>> hand (which does kinda make me scream pretty loudly) I'm ok. But,
>> hey, pooping isn't a problem! So, yeah, it "works" for me!
>>
>> This is scary. I just wrote 21 lines and, with all of the message
>> groups and email partners I have, that was the most interesting thing
>> I found here tonight. Geez.
>
> Perhaps you are disappointed over not making it as a proctologist?
> ("...not making it..." - Get it?)
>
>> I'm gonna go pour another bourbon now.
>
> Might as well. Once the threshold's been exceeded...
>
No, not yet. Although, with the last one I really do have to
contemplate that whole proctologist possibility.
Ok, lemme think on that ...
NOT!
No, I think that another bourbon would be better placed.
Oh, and in case you may think that I did not evaluate the OP's original
request for evaluation:
http://edmullen.net/temp/t.html
Seems the code works ok.
As to his bowels? Hey, I'm pouring another bourbon, not taking
proctological advanced exams nor obsessing over his/her code.
Or, as a friend of mine once may have said: "Oh, shit!"
Sadly, I am easily amused. But! Well lubricated thanks to Makers Mark.
And now, against the Irish poet's advice: I do now go gently into that
good night.
--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
http://mozilla.edmullen.net
http://abington.edmullen.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|