|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 07/21/07 04:53
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:37:43
GMT Animesh K scribed:
> Neredbojias wrote:
>> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007
>> 22:27:57 GMT Animesh K scribed:
>>
>>> Beta ... err. Well I am a cook and I am experimenting with dishes.
>>> Will you be my guest and get bad food just because my dish is Beta.
>>
>> You're assuming "bad". It's quality is unknown until tested. -The
>> rationale of beta.
>>
>
> Are we getting into a logical debate now :)
No. I was generalizing and had forgotten your post of a few slots back.
However, my point was that beta in general isn't necessarily bad even for
individuals.
> I was working with the beta browser and it didn't cut n paste right.
> Taste detected and mentioned. No? I think browser developers (or their
> friends) can test it out. Big companies can easily shell out a few
> thousand bucks extra for this purpose.
See what you mean although I think any new "item" needs real-world
evaluation for a true test of its worth.
> Just keep $10 per bug award and watch. Ummm Msoft may go bankrupt
> though, with such a scheme.
Wouldn't that be a shame? :)
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|