Posted by Sanders Kaufman on 07/23/07 17:01

Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>> So - it's okay in the purist of OOP to have a child that presumes
>> things about the parent, but not t'other way 'round?
>>
>
> Not just a purist. Its the way things HAVE to be.

That's what I meant.
I was using "purist" in it's adjective form, not noun - as in, "the most
pure".

• Next in forum: Re: Using a Resource as a Class Property
• Prev in forum: Re: Problem with PHP output
• Thread view: Re: Using a Resource as a Class Property

[Reply to this message]