|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 07/25/07 02:24
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>
>>> If I were to write a "reinit()" it would do exactly the same thing.
>>> How is that not redundant?
>>
>> And it is incorrect to do it this way, and will eventually cause you
>> problems.
>>
>> What happens, for instance, if PHP changes so that the base class
>> constructor is called automatically?
>
>
> There is absolutely no chance that the PHP team will change PHP4 to
> behave that way.
>
> Look - I'm wanting to do like you guys say, be all correct about not
> cutting academic corners. I much prefer doing it right, simply because
> it is right.
>
> But this is a PHP application, with some value added by OOP - not the
> other way around.
>
> And as y'all full well know, PHP4 ain't a proper OOP language. So no
> matter how much I might bend over backwards to treat it that way - it
> ain't gonna happen cause it can't.
>
>
>
>> There is no replacement for good programming - and no excuse for
>> sloppy programming.
>
> Sloppy, in this case, would be to get sidetracked into adding redundant
> features in order to program pure OOP - even though the language doesnt
> fully support it and the environment doesn't not require it.
>
> I appreciate y'alls help - but I'm here to please the end user, not the
> consultants.
>
> And really... about those charities...
>
>
And what happens when your server upgrades to PHP5.2 or PHP6 or
whatever? They're not going to be on PHP4 forever, you know.
The best way to please the end user is to write good - not sloppy - code.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|