|
|
Posted by Rik on 07/25/07 15:51
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:31:04 +0200, Webrickco <webrickco@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, try do do it on my site. The same page (under the link
> "counter") accesses the same file twice.
But not at the same time. For that, 2 requests/instances/processes of your
script would have to be fired up at nearly the same time.
> Anyway, even if i'm not familiar with internal processing of servers,
Which shows.
> i'm sure most of them have queuying facility, like most serious
> servers, like mainframes, under monitors like CICS have, garantying
> units of work are processed sequencially and never at the same time.
> But i let this to your consideration.
To answer the hidden question: no, this is not automagically taken care of.
> Also considering that a request like this very simple function is
> processed within the same ms, the "reasonably active website" you are
> talking about, represents something like some million hits a day!
Well, the likelyhood adds up on active websites. Then again, a page can
have only 2 hits in its entire lifespan, it's still possible that they
coincide.
> I do
> not believe that kind of site, would show an ugly counter like mine!
So, you say your script just 'works most of the time', is ugly(sic), you
refuse to heed advise about improving it, and you still are spamming
usenet to check them out?
--
Rik Wasmus
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|