|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 07/30/07 17:25
Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>
>> Michael Fesser wrote:
>>> * using .htaccess you can enable that on a per-directory basis
>> So? It's still a waste of resources.
>
> Like storing images in a database for example. Who's wasting resources
> then?
>
Not at all. Databases are quite efficient at retrieving data -
including images.
>>> * if you're using PHP for more than just a form on a single page, then
>>> it doesn't matter, because all pages have to be parsed anyway
>> Only if they contain php code.
>
> As said, "if you're using PHP for more than just a form on a single
> page", then it's very likely that all pages contain PHP code, even if
> it's just an include of a menu bar script.
>
Nope. Not at all. I have several sites with some pages which have no
PHP in them at all. And if they have a menu bar script, they're
included with SSI.
>>> * the file extension .html (or no extension at all) is preferred for
>>> stable URIs
>> That's your opinion, anyway.
>
> Not only mine. It's also the W3C's opinion.
>
> Micha
Exactly where do they say that? And where do they say they've taken
over programming and support for Apache, IIS, and other web servers?
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|