|
|
Posted by G on 07/31/07 23:30
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:11:25 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:19:13 -0700, Chaddy2222
>>> <spamlovermailbox-sicurity@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Well yes, but at least if you find a bad HTML site you can turn
>>>>>> off styleing and still get to the content that you need!.
>>>>>> You can't do that at all with a Flash site.
>>>
>>>>> If the site is CSS'd yes you can turn off styling. But you're
>>>>> adding another technology into the mix. HTML itself is a
>>>>> presentational mess.
>>>> Yep, although it was / is not really ment to be used for
>>>> presentation. It being HTML in this case. It's just ment to
>>>> describe the function of a particular thing, a block of text as a
>>>> paragraph as an example. Although at times the technology needs to
>>>> be used in a way which some people will not agree with, but in
>>>> those types of situations I think the best a designer can do is to
>>>> provide some kind of fall-back method so people can still get some
>>>> value out of the content.
>>>
>>> That's good when you want to keep in mind retards, I keep retards in
>>> mind on my primary site where I have a plain text fall back version,
>>> HOWEVER, for those that aren't retarded, they understand that
>>> content and design are VERY much interlinked and dependant on one
>>> another.
>>>
>>> Please try and read this...if you aren't retarded:
>>>> http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12516-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34733&messageID=639263&start=-9994
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hmmm, that would depend on what you think is "great". Although
>>>> Flash is ideal for art type sites and those kind of sites that
>>>> don't actually require anyone to gain access to the information
>>>> (music / band sites are a bit of an exception to the rule). Due to
>>>> the fact that a lot of bands need to use extensive branding
>>>> (specific fonts etc that can't be provided *easily* any other way.
>>>
>>> WRONG!
>>>
>>> Even for just a PLAIN TEXT SITE, Flash is VASTLY superior to HTML
>>> in a whole variety of ways, from being able to embed fonts, to
>>> having proper font anti-aliasing, to having true liquid sized text
>>> as opposed to just liquid space stretched text.
>>>
>>> Again, it's all about the designer, yes in the hands of an AMATEUR
>>> it may not be possible to create a site like that and, yes, you
>>> amateurs should stick to kiddie, training pants languages like
>>> HTML. Simply put, Flash was NOT made for amateur web designers,
>>> it's made for PROFESSIONALS and ARTISTS. It's the difference
>>> between oil paints and Crayolas. You would NEVER give a three year
>>> old a box of oil paints, Crayolas, yes, oil paints...no.
>>
>> chili?
>
> Did you ever see that movie with Michael Keaton, Mr. Mom?
yes, and lived it for awhile too.
;)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|