Posted by Andy Dingley on 08/09/07 14:43

On 9 Aug, 11:59, James <j.pre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A long long time ago I read on a site about optimizing web pages that
> said to _not_ use images 1px high for repeating backgrounds

Its current irrelevance is obvious, but just where and when did you
find such a snippet that was _never_ correct?

• Next in forum: Re: div in div position
• Prev in forum: Re: How much to US developers charge
• Thread view: Re: Repeating Background Image Size

[Reply to this message]