|
|
Posted by Tim Streater on 08/09/07 17:57
In article <fkIui.26692$ax1.198@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote:
> Tim Streater wrote:
>
> > Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Javascript should be used as an enhancement. When vital elements do
> >> not work, then yes, it's time to get rid of the javascript. Do
> >> something server side.
> >
> > Is this a general rule, then?
>
> A real rule? Probably not, but would you want to risk losing ~10% of
> your annual business because visitors couldn't navigate your web site?
> It's not an actual rule, but it certainly is good common sense, eh?
Well, it depends, doesn't it? The wesbite I manage at work is a front
end to our assets database. It's used by our engineers, finance,
development, and operations teams, and by selected engineers of some of
our customers. It wouldn't work worth beans with extensive use of
Javascript, PHP, and iframes.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|