|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 08/09/07 20:32
Tim Streater wrote:
<snip>
> But then I lurk here, and I see it said that:
>
> 1) Javascript evil
Very useful but because of past abuse and security flaws I would say not
dependable.
> 2) Frames evil
Was an ad hoc way of modularizing web page content (or steal it) before
server-side solutions were readily available or affordable. Server-side
is far superior without the well discussed problems frames cause. Why
would you use an ax to cut down a tree after the advent of the chainsaw?
> 3) iframes evil
Ditto! Just an MS's take on the frame. As I recall frame was Netscape's
baby...
>
> and I'm never quite sure whether that's because:
>
> 1) the statements made pertain to a particular set of circumstances
> 2) these things really *are* evil and I am a bozo for being ignorant of
> some other technique which solves all my problems pronto.
>
> Hence my question.
I'd say a little from #1 and a little from #2 ;-)
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|