|
|
Posted by Crash\" Dummy on 08/09/07 20:38
> If he's stuck with pre-existing .html files and he can't rename them, I don't
> know of too many other options. : )
> If he were to change all his files to .php, to add dynamic content, the server
> would still have to parse all the content. It would probably take more time to
> rename all the files to the .php extension, then adjusting the config in
Apache.
> In either case the server would have to parse the PHP content whether it was
> working with .php or .html files.
True enough, but I was under the impression that he only wants/needs to do this
for a single page ("I am trying to add some dynamic content to an existing HTML
page."). I am just pointing out the cost of treating all passive files as PHP.
If he just wants to preserve an existing URL, he could use a simple redirect to
transfer the call to a PHP file.
--
Crash
Running: Windows 2000 Pro - Apache 2.2.4 - PHP 5.2.1 - PERL 5.8.8
Reply to group only. E-mail is blocked.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|