|
|
Posted by dorayme on 08/10/07 07:44
In article
<Xns9987F385C1CFDnanopandaneredbojias@198.186.190.161>,
Neredbojias <monstersquasher@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 05:56:18 GMT
> dorayme scribed:
>
> >> > I have better description of problem here in code below.
> >>
> >> No, you don't. That "code" tells me nothing. A url is required to see
> >> the real problem although your markup indicates inaccuracy and
> >> invalidity.
> >
> > But so important is the quoted code that you quote it all over
> > again. Does the idea of editing a post not mean anything to you
> > unless your emotions are engaged?
>
> I quoted it only because I referred to it.
If this is the criteria, then God help us all. You wrote to
dismiss all interest in it, not to refer to it for some useful
purpose evident in what you had to say. Getting this point or
shaping up to resist with your usual schmuckery...
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|