|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 08/10/07 08:11
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:44:50
GMT dorayme scribed:
>> >> > I have better description of problem here in code below.
>> >>
>> >> No, you don't. That "code" tells me nothing. A url is required
>> >> to see the real problem although your markup indicates inaccuracy
>> >> and invalidity.
>> >
>> > But so important is the quoted code that you quote it all over
>> > again. Does the idea of editing a post not mean anything to you
>> > unless your emotions are engaged?
>>
>> I quoted it only because I referred to it.
>
> If this is the criteria, then God help us all. You wrote to
> dismiss all interest in it, not to refer to it for some useful
> purpose evident in what you had to say. Getting this point or
> shaping up to resist with your usual schmuckery...
Well, I can see your opinionated side of things, but I simply followed the
rules. If you refer to something, you should quote it. What's the big
deal, anyway? If a few extra lines of text can upset your world, how
tentative that world must be.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|