|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 08/10/07 10:16
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:43:35
GMT dorayme scribed:
>> >> >> > I have better description of problem here in code below.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No, you don't. That "code" tells me nothing. A url is
>> >> >> required to see the real problem although your markup indicates
>> >> >> inaccuracy and invalidity.
>> >> >
>> >> > But so important is the quoted code that you quote it all over
>> >> > again. Does the idea of editing a post not mean anything to you
>> >> > unless your emotions are engaged?
>> >>
>> >> I quoted it only because I referred to it.
>> >
>> > If this is the criteria, then God help us all. You wrote to
>> > dismiss all interest in it, not to refer to it for some useful
>> > purpose evident in what you had to say. Getting this point or
>> > shaping up to resist with your usual schmuckery...
>>
>> Well, I can see your opinionated side of things, but I simply
>> followed the rules. If you refer to something, you should quote it.
>> What's the big deal, anyway? If a few extra lines of text can upset
>> your world, how tentative that world must be.
>
> I told you ages ago the story about Travis' candidate for
> President of a country that produced the Jazz musical form, 12
> Angry Men, and some of the most interesting things on God's
> earth, America! Yup, George Bush!
>
> Now there is a schmuck, surely! And the story was about Peter
> Singer's analysis of his arrested moral development. He had to
> make a speech that was to be broadcast the following Saturday. In
> the middle of the speech, he kept stopping and objecting at the
> line that read "... and today I ..." because he thought this was
> somehow lying! It was not Saturday already!
>
> Jesus Christ!
>
> You see, Boji, he learnt his moral rules like a parrot and had no
> real understanding of them, what was important about them. He
> never grew up properly. He drank too much and that is perhaps
> what hindered his progress? I suspect, in his case, his
> Christianity was an effect of a basic deep down problem rather
> than the cause of it. Some Christians are quite sophisticated and
> it takes skill to see through the best of them.
>
> Since you are being not directly offensive to me, I will just
> give you some advice. Examine the rules you follow and see what
> is important about them, pick out the relevant bits and adapt to
> situations. Try not to be a George.
Um, okay, I guess. I don't like GB, either, but I don't know if I can
attribute his failings to what you said. I think he's just conceited, a
bit of a power-monger, and even less altruistic than a "normal" person
with an inflated ego might be. It's like "Hooray for George, and what
peons...?" Public Service often is shucked at the top, and I think
Georgy boy is more interested in service to his family and peers than to
the overall citizenry of this country. What gets me, though, is I sat
there and watched much of his second election returns, and a majority of
the morons here did, indeed, vote for him. So much for the intelligence
of the American people...
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|