|
|
Posted by dorayme on 08/10/07 23:35
In article <m21webc7th.fsf@dot-app.org>,
Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@dot-app.org> wrote:
> It's not ascribed to the W3C site in particular, it's the definition of the
> term "validator." A validator is an SGML or XML based tool that checks a
> document against its DTD. Calling something a validator when it doesn't do
> that is dishonest.
>
> Frankly, I think it's a shame - Albert's product, despite not being what he
> claims it is, is still very useful. It catches problems that validators
> don't. He lost a lot of potential customers (myself included) who despise
> lies on principle, and might have purchased his product if he had marketed
> it honestly.
Well, there you go Albert, no matter what the truth is, there are
some knowledgeable people getting a certain impression. So, see
what you can change in your advertising to reflect the good
things in your product and modify the claims that are giving this
impression.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|