|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 08/11/07 00:16
dorayme wrote:
> In article <5bb6b$46bcee18$40cba7aa$6340@NAXS.COM>,
> "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
>
>> Of course we may dispel the speculation if we could actually *see* the code!
>>
>
> It _is_ exquisitely frustrating! To think, for all his need for
> secrecy, we could poke about as much as we liked in Luigi's code.
>
I bet the answer is invalid markup. Firefox makes one *assumption* on
first load as page is build from remote source but makes another upon
drawing from cache. I have see such behavior with other bad pages and
other browsers...but screw it if this page is so secret the OP can live
with the problem!
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|