|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 08/11/07 05:37
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:35:13
GMT Bear Bottoms scribed:
>> The point isn't whether CSE is useful, the point is that Albert is
>> calling
>> it a validator, when it's not.
>>
>> sherm--
>>
> Sorry, but I think that certainly is a snotty nosed reason to trash
> software authors. If his program validates the code on my website,
> then his software is a validator in my book. Grey Poupon anyone?
I know nothing about CSE, and believe I have no pre-judgmental attitudes
regarding it, pro or con. But s'pose you have 2 different web pages. Cse
says the first is 100% valid and the w3c validator says the second is 100%
valid. Which opinion can one have more faith in?
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|