|
|
Posted by Albert Wiersch on 08/11/07 15:10
"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:doraymeRidThis->
>
> Well, there you go Albert, no matter what the truth is, there are
> some knowledgeable people getting a certain impression. So, see
> what you can change in your advertising to reflect the good
> things in your product and modify the claims that are giving this
> impression.
One of the reasons I decided to include a DTD based validator with CSE HTML
Validator Std/Pro v8.0+ was to try to address these "naming" issues, but
adding a DTD based validator doesn't seem to have helped at all. I like to
please but I understand you can't please everyone!
By the way, I have NEVER claimed it to be a DTD based validator.
Albert
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|