|
|
Posted by Shelly on 07/18/05 05:00
I have a little more information.
I took the file and copied it to the root level . It displayed fine with
http://www.mydomain.net/the_filename.jpg. I then tried to copy it to the
"users" directory, figuring I would see if it would display in each
directory. It would not copy. It would also not copy to the
"users/the_username" directory.
The ownership of the "users" directory and that of the "tmp_photo" directory
are both "webmaster" and the protections on both are 777. Both of these are
immediately off the root directory. I can copy it manually into the
"tmp_photo" directory.
The ownership of the "the_username" and "photo" directories are both
"apache" since both are created by apache.
Why, if both directories ("users" and "tmp_photo") have the same ownership
and the same protections, can I copy into one and not the other. I think if
I can figure that one out, all will be solved.
Shelly
"Shelly" <sheldonlg.news@asap-consult.com> wrote in message
news:POydnW8aiNxEaUffRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> This is driving me crazy and makes no sense. Any suggestions will be
> appreciated.
>
> I upload an image to a staging area. I have written software to look at
> the images, and if accepted it is moved to the user's area. The user's
> area for images is at users/the_username/photo/ where users is a
> directory off the root. The staging area is tmp_photo/, also off the
> root.
>
> When it is in the staging area, I see the image. Using identical code (I
> cut an pasted), the image does not display when I use viewing php page. I
> echoed the filename and it came up as:
>
> users/the_username/photo/the_filename.jpg
>
> When I look via admin, I see that the file is there. If I click on it
> and download it, it views perfectly on my computer.
>
> Also, if I right click on the little square on my viewing page that is
> there instead of the image that should be there, and look at the
> properties, it comes up as:
>
> http://www.mydomain.net/users/the_username/photo/the_filename.jpg
>
> So, the coding for the name is perfect. I have the <img
> src="the_full_filemame" width="200">.
>
> I checked the protections of the file, and all the directories from users
> on down and they all have execute privilege.
>
> By the way, on another place on that same viewing screen for a particular
> situation where there is no photo, I direct it to an image
> images/nopicyet.jpg. That one displays perfectly. The protections on
> that directory are the same as on the users directory tree.
>
> Does anyone have a clue?
>
> Shelly
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|