|
|
Posted by Franklin on 08/12/07 03:41
On 12 Aug 04:19, POKO <pokokat@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <Xns998A27945C2AAQ78XD91A@127.0.0.1>,
> frank.says@no.spam.com says...
>> On 12 Aug 02:40, Steve T. <Stephen.T09736636@mail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> My page is a simple listing of programs
>> >
>> > -- snip --
>> >
>> > Sorry, but that is crap html. For a start, FONT is deprecated.
>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/ You'd better learn some CSS.
>> >
>> > You see, 'transitional' is rather meaningless, you get away with
>> > a lot, too much in fact. Try html 4.01 strict (or better still
>> > xhtml).
>> >
>> > Steve T.
>>
>>
>> Oops! Now you've torn it, Steve. Mr Bottoms hates being shown up
>> as the technical pygmy he is.
>>
>> He needs to be seen as some technical colossus who can assess
>> weighty and difficult freeware and pronounce loudly on its merits.
>>
>>
>> The fact is mr Bottoms doesn't even download some of the software
>> he promotes. Ssome is still at a design stage! Often his
>> 'masterly' technical dissection of some freeware is based on crude
>> cut and paste of someone else's review.
>>
>> So watch out now. You have exposed him as a fake and a fool. But
>> I guess we knew that all along.
>>
> Not totally fair - after a long day of developing css's sometimes I
> just throw in a <font></font> to get the job done faster. And I've
> been known to use tables - eeeek, the CSS Gods must be upset with
> me about that. If it works, what's the problem,
> POKO designerwhotakesshortcuts
I don't think een Mr Bottoms would claim he wrote at that level.
He blames a package for doing it wrong for him.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|