Posted by dorayme on 08/14/07 21:46
In article <Ktcwi.206826$1_7.131574@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi>,
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> (I don't expect a person claiming "Corn Flakes" to be his or her full name
> to be _able_ to argue.)
This is an interesting thought. Do arguments need an authority
behind them to add to their force? I would say a good argument
stands on its merits, just as a good picture does. If you have to
look behind an argument to see who said it, it usually means you
are not impressed with the argument itself.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|