|
|
Posted by Richard on 08/15/07 05:52
On Aug 14, 10:07 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <a52ap4-hoe....@xword.teksavvy.com>,
> "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2007-08-14, Richard wrote:
>
> > > But I got this "name" attribute from
> > >http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_links.asp,
> > > where it claims:
> > ><quote>
> > ><a name="tips">Useful Tips Section</a>
>
> > That usage is not recommended however; it is generally considered
> > better to use the "id" attribute instead.
>
> One reason it is better is that it is simpler to use/type.
> Another is to avoid having to code to avoid hover effects on
> "named anchors" which are really not appropriate. These hover
> effects and other effects can easily creep in from the css sheet
> which generally specifies anchors. You will find id_ing much
> cleaner and simpler to use for the purpose.
>
> --
> dorayme
Hi dorayme,
Interesting -- nice to know.
Best wishes,
Richard
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|