|
|
Posted by dorayme on 08/16/07 03:54
In article <13c7hllaqu4472@corp.supernews.com>,
mbstevens <NOXwebmasterx@xmbstevensx.com> wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
> > In article <nTKwi.207876$Ta7.73655@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi>,
> > "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> >
> >> ... pure red is seldom a feasible
> >> color for text.)
> >
> > A web page on the "Galileo of Graphics" breaks out the red paint:
> >
> > http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/
> >
>
> What a huge disappointment (but thanks for posting it).
> His books actually have a lot of useful information.
>
> But on that web page the 'Forum Topics' are hard to read
> and should be bulleted, or at least separated by a
> little space from each other, and the validator is having
> a major Red Bull rage over the thing. I can only hope it's
> more of a publisher thing over which that he didn't have sufficient
> control.
>
> As to the red links, I don't really have a huge objection, but
> middle red is not the way to go. The red should be toned down
> toward black a bit.
I have no disagreement with any of this. I particularly agree
about the darker red being more appropriate for text if reddish
it is to be.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|