|
Posted by Andy Dingley on 08/24/07 09:39
On 24 Aug, 01:31, "ish...@gmail.com" <ish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I will go with the class=active idea.
I'd suggest class="current" rather than "active".
There's already the :active pseudo-element in HTML, and life's
confusing enough already without mixing terms up.
> It sounds the easiest.
It is.
> There is probably a more sophisticated way that I'll learn in the future.
There are, but that doesn't mean "better" or "more appropriate".
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|