|
Posted by David Segall on 08/25/07 07:00
"mrcakey" <nospam@spamispoo.com> wrote:
>"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
>news:AmDzi.457927$p47.142005@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
><snip>
>>
>> Don't use XHTML.
>>
>
>What's up with XHTML?
The main arguments against it are at
<http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml>.
An amusing counter-argument to Hickson's is here
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2007Jun/0008.html>.
The main argument in favour of XHTML is that the World Wide Web
Consortium, the source for HTML scripture, uses it.
<http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Activity.html>.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|