Posted by mrcakey on 08/25/07 08:28

"David Segall" <david@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:9tivc39a32u3nruhgbe1cgpolkk5papm4r@4ax.com...
> "mrcakey" <nospam@spamispoo.com> wrote:
>
>>"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:AmDzi.457927$p47.142005@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>><snip>
>>>
>>> Don't use XHTML.
>>>
>>
>>What's up with XHTML?
> The main arguments against it are at
> <http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml>.
> An amusing counter-argument to Hickson's is here
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2007Jun/0008.html>.
> The main argument in favour of XHTML is that the World Wide Web
> Consortium, the source for HTML scripture, uses it.
> <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Activity.html>.

Thanks for that.

Am I doing something wrong then? I changed the content-type value for the
index page to xml on the site I'm building for my friend and it still works
fine as far as I can see. Even in IE6.

http://www.ladolcevita.org.uk/

+mrcakey

• Next in forum: MI5 Persecution: BBC1 TV News - 18/Dec/2002 (7883)
• Prev in forum: MI5 Persecution: Channel Four TV News - 10/April/2002 (6660)
• Thread view: Re: Learning HTML: building a Web Site: What do you think of this www?

[Reply to this message]