|
|
Posted by Travis Newbury on 07/19/05 01:20
Andy Dingley wrote:
>>HTML that is w3c standards compliant,
> There are no W3C standards, because even the W3C isn't a standards body.
> Now no-one (with a life) _cares_ about this, and as W3C is independent
> and platform agnostic (<snort>), then at least it looks like a standards
> body. But "standard" does actually have a strict legalese definition,
> and the W3C don't meet it. If you search their own site you can find the
> full explanation on why they issue "TR"s, rather than standards.
Well if you want to get anal about it yes. But they represent the
closest thing to standards as there is. Which, by the way, was my
point. " What standard are they [the posters] talking about?"
--
-=tn=-
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|