|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 08/30/07 19:23
Animesh K wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>
>> Also...
>>
>> @page { size:landscape; size:29.7cm 21.0cm; ...
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> What is this? CSS3 don't expect many browsers to support this yet. We
>> cannot even get MS to cooperate and support CSS2.1 with their *new*
>> browser!
>>
>
> If you think MS Bindows does better with time, you are mistaken.
>
> Vista's SP1 is supposed to fix bugs like:
>
> 1) Improving time-estimates of copy-paste or move-files.
> 2) Minimizing memory leaks.
> 3) Improving screensaver's effect on performance.
> 4) Better use of RAM.
Huh?
We are taking about *web* browsers and CSS support right?
1) I don't want my *web* to copy, paste, move, mangle, whatever files on
my local file system.
2) Kudos
3) What does my screen saver got to do with anything? Haven't used a
screen saver since my kids would annoy me with the lawnmower man and
bungee-jumping cows in After Dark of Win3.1 era.
4) Only because much of resource is hidden as part of OS, because IE
*is* part of OS.
>
> Need I say more? I mean item 1) is like they are doing it since Windows
> 95 or 98!
Are you trolling or are you reading a different thread?
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|