|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 09/01/07 19:33
Rik Wasmus wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:39:06 +0200, The Natural Philosopher <a@b.c> wrote:
>
>> Rik Wasmus wrote:
>>> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:13:33 +0200, Rik Wasmus
>>> <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:42:59 +0200, The Natural Philosopher <a@b.c>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> If you really want a chunked upload check out the user comments
>>>>>> at <http://nl3.php.net/manual/en/function.readfile.php>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you dyslexic, I want to DOWNLOAD. Upload I have done already.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bah, 't was late last night... I meant to say download, allthough it
>>>> depends wether you think usercentric or usercentric which is which :P
>>> Hmmmz, haven't made a full recovery yet I see, "usercentric or
>>> servercentric"...
>>>
>> its Saturday, Get a bottle of decent spirits and relax. ;-)
>>
>> Anyway I have enough onfo op spec out that part of e jobn. Muy necxt
>> problem is wheher
>
> Hehe, taking you own advice? :P
>
>> its more efficient to have 5000 files all called 00001, 00002...05000
>> in one directory, or whether to split them up over several..and
>> whether to keep their names and extensions intact, or just be lazy,
>> knowing the data base knows what they were called.
>
> Hmm, depends on the file system, not really an expert there. Jerry would
> tell you to just serve them up straight from the database, and forget
> about the filesystem, I'm not so sure :). You can do a little testing
> offcourse, see what works best.
Rik,
Yep, it works great - and the more images you have, the better it works.
Databases are far better at massive numbers of elements than file systems.
Buy he's already decided I don't know what I'm talking about because I
told him he should have E_NOTICE enabled.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|