Posted by John Hosking on 09/03/07 19:00

Adrienne Boswell wrote:
> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed sevillad <sevillad@gmail.com>
> writing in news:1188838643.367029.110840@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com:

>> I was trying to make my main page compliant

>> http://www.davidsevilla.com/
>>
>> >From what I've read around, I think it's related to having "noscript"
>> inside a "p".
>
> Yes, because NOSCRIPT is a block level element, and the P element cannot
> contain other block level elements.

Well, I'll be dipped. You're right; it is.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#edef-NOSCRIPT

And yet <script> isn't.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#edef-SCRIPT

Now does that make sense? No.


--
John
Pondering the value of the UIP: http://improve-usenet.org/

• Next in forum: Re: Problem with CSS file in IE7
• Prev in forum: HTML comment affects page layout and speed
• Thread view: Re: Transitional validation with "noscript"

[Reply to this message]