Posted by John Hosking on 09/04/07 01:17

Neredbojias wrote:
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:00:50
> GMT John Hosking scribed:
> > Adrienne Boswell wrote:

>>> Yes, because NOSCRIPT is a block level element, and the P element
>>> cannot contain other block level elements.
>> Well, I'll be dipped. You're right; it is.
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#edef-NOSCRIPT
>>
>> And yet <script> isn't.
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#edef-SCRIPT
>>
>> Now does that make sense? No.
>
> The contents of <noscript></noscript> is html. Not so with <script>
> </script>.

Okay, so now it makes sense. That happens sometimes after I actually
think about them. :-)

--
John
Pondering the value of the UIP: http://improve-usenet.org/

• Next in forum: Re: Obfuscating email addresses in mailto: links
• Prev in forum: Re: New Exciting Webmaster tools added! @Services.imasty.com
• Thread view: Re: Transitional validation with "noscript"

[Reply to this message]