Posted by Neredbojias on 09/04/07 08:32

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 04 Sep 2007 01:17:44 GMT
John Hosking scribed:

>>>> Yes, because NOSCRIPT is a block level element, and the P element
>>>> cannot contain other block level elements.
>>> Well, I'll be dipped. You're right; it is.
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#edef-NOSCRIPT
>>>
>>> And yet <script> isn't.
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#edef-SCRIPT
>>>
>>> Now does that make sense? No.
>>
>> The contents of <noscript></noscript> is html. Not so with <script>
>> </script>.
>
> Okay, so now it makes sense. That happens sometimes after I actually
> think about them. :-)

He he, yes, I know what you mean. :)

What I said didn't actually occur to me until I read your message.

--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.

• Next in forum: Re: Transitional validation with "noscript"
• Prev in forum: Re: Problem with CSS file in IE7
• Thread view: Re: Transitional validation with "noscript"

[Reply to this message]