|
|
Posted by asdf on 09/08/07 03:55
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:KrmEi.506138$p47.387637@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Phillip Mann wrote:
>
>> From all the messages about "font size" vs "h's", it's my
>> understanding that the old html don't work anymore.
>
> It will still "work", for some value of "work." Would you not care to
> take advantage of, for example, search engine rating headings higher
> than regular text?
>
> <p><font size=+2>How about ease of maintenance?</font></p>
> <h1>How about ease of maintenance?</h1>
>
>> Is this true just for some people in this newsgroup or is it
>> universal?
>
> Well, the more people that tune in here and find out they are still
> writing 1996 markup, and update their style, the better the web will be
> in the future.
>
> Would you rather drive a 1996 car, or a 2007 car?
>
> --
> -bts
> -Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
....the 1996 car was easier and cheaper to maintain and repair than the 2007
model. :|
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|