|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 09/08/07 01:16
Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>
>> Michael Fesser wrote:
>>
>> Don't start this argument again.
>
> Believe me - I don't want to. But some of the things he (J.O.) posted
> were simply wrong or at least questionable.
>
Nothing J.O. said was either wrong or questionable.
>> It doesn't matter what machine you're on. There is significant
>> additional processing required to parse files unnecessarily.
>
> On my servers it's not "significant", but I don't want to discuss that
> anymore. I pay for the server and I just use what I pay for, that's it.
>
Then you haven't checked it closely, or you don't have any load on the
server.
>> That's
>> probably why his host disabled it - they know and understand the impact.
>
> I doubt that. Except for prohibiting .htaccess entirely there's not much
> a host can do. There are nearly half a dozen ways to embed PHP into the
> webserver, so it just depends on which method was used by the host.
>
> Micha
And why is that? After all, that is their job - managing servers to
make efficient use of the resources.
And there is more than one way to achieve the url independence you so
often refer to. But you only know one of them, so that's all that must
exist.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|